Hardback
Intellectual Property and Private International Law
This collection, made possible by the recent convergence of intellectual property and private international law as critical disciplines, brings together the most important papers on these now linked subjects. More and more issues of private international law arise in the area of intellectual property, and the articles selected chart the route that both disciplines have covered together, discussing bridges built and dead-ends reached.
More Information
Contributors
Contents
More Information
This collection, made possible by the recent convergence of intellectual property and private international law as critical disciplines, brings together the most important papers on these now linked subjects. More and more issues of private international law arise in the area of intellectual property, and the articles selected chart the route that both disciplines have covered together, discussing bridges built and dead-ends reached.
Also looking forward to the future of the subject, with an original introduction by Professor Paul Torremans, Intellectual Property and Private International Law will prove to be an essential research tool for all students, academics and practitioners working in this fast-developing area.
Also looking forward to the future of the subject, with an original introduction by Professor Paul Torremans, Intellectual Property and Private International Law will prove to be an essential research tool for all students, academics and practitioners working in this fast-developing area.
Contributors
33 articles, dating from 1991 to 2013
Contributors include: S. Bariatti, P. de Miguel, G. Dinwoodie, J. Ginsburg, C. Heinze, A. Kur, A. Metzger, M. Trimble, G. Westcamp
Contributors include: S. Bariatti, P. de Miguel, G. Dinwoodie, J. Ginsburg, C. Heinze, A. Kur, A. Metzger, M. Trimble, G. Westcamp
Contents
Contents:
Introduction Paul Torremans
PART I TERRITORIALITY
1. Sophie Neumann (2011), ‘Intellectual Property Rights Infringements in European Private International Law: Meeting the Requirements of Territoriality and Private International Law’, Journal of Private International Law, 7 (3), December, 583–600
2. Teruo Doi (2002), ‘The Territoriality Principle of Patent Protection and Conflict of Laws: A Review of Japanese Court Decisions’, Fordham International Law Journal, 26 (2), 377–95
PART II JURISDICTION: MOVING ON FROM THE TERRITORIAL STARTING POINT
3. Lydia Lundstedt (2001), ‘Jurisdiction and the Principle of Territoriality in Intellectual Property Law: Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far in the Other Direction?’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 32 (1), 124–141
4. Benedetta Ubertazzi (2011), ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Exclusive (Subject Matter) Jurisdiction: Between Private and Public International Law’, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 15 (2), Summer, 357–448
5. Mario Franzosi (1997), ‘Worldwide Patent Litigation and the Italian Torpedo’, European Intellectual Property Review, 19 (7), July, 382–5
6. Paul Torremans (2011), ‘The Sense or Nonsense of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Foreign Copyright’, European Intellectual Property Review, 33 (6), 349–56
7. Paul L.C. Torremans (2011), ‘Star Wars Rids Us of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court Does Not Like Kafka Either When It Comes to Copyright’, European Intellectual Property Review, 33 (12), 813–7
8. Annette Kur (2006), ‘A Farewell to Cross-Border Injunctions? The ECJ Decisions GAT v. LuK and Roche Nederland v. Primus and Goldenberg’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 37 (7), 844-55
9. Mario Franzosi (2009), ‘GAT and Roche — Idola Fori, Teatri, Specus: Regulation 864/2007 Makes Cross-Border Patent Litigation Possible’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 4 (4), April, 247–55
10. Benedetta Ubertazzi (2009), ‘Licence Agreements Relating to IP Rights and the EC Regulation on Jurisdiction’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 40 (8), 912–39
11. Matthias Rößler (2007), ‘The Court of Jurisdiction for Joint Parties in International Patent Disputes’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 38 (4), 380–400
12. Christian Heinze (2011), ‘Choice of Court Agreements, Coordination of Proceedings and Provisional Measures in the Reform of the Brussels I Regulation’, Rabels Zeitschrift für Ausländisches und Internationales Privatrecht, 75 (3), July, 581–618
13. Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio (2007), ‘Cross-Border Adjudication of Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Between Jurisdictions’, Annali Italiani del Diritto d’Autore, della Cultura e Dello Spettacolo, XVI, 105–54
PART III CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES
14. Anna Tydniouk (2004), ‘From Itar-Tass to Films by Jove: The Conflict of Laws Revolution in International Copyright’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 29 (2), 897–936
15. Paul Torremans and Carmen Otero García Castrillón (2012), ‘Reversionary Copyright: A Ghost of the Past or a Current Trap to Assignments of Copyright?’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2, 77–93
16. Guido Westkamp (2006), ‘Research Agreements and Joint Ownership of Intellectual Property Rights in Private International Law’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 37 (6), 637–61
17. Paul Torremans (2010), ‘Copyright: Which Law Applies? Some Thoughts on Issues of Authorship, (First) Ownership of Rights and Works Created by Employees’, ΔiMEE Media and Communications Law Review, 1, 6–12
18. Jane C. Ginsburg and Pierre Sirinelli (1991), ‘Authors and Exploitations in International Private Law: The French Supreme Court and the Huston Film Colorization Controversy’, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts, 15, 135–59
19. Paul Torremans (2008), ‘Licenses and Assignments of Intellectual Property Rights Under the Rome I Regulation’, Journal of Private International Law, 4 (3), December, 397–420
20. Christopher Wadlow (2009), ‘The New Private International Law of Unfair Competition and the “Rome II” Regulation’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 4 (11), November, 789–97
21. Toshiyuki Kono (2005), ‘Intellectual Property Rights, Conflict of Laws and International Jurisdiction: Applicability of ALI Principles in Japan?’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 30 (3), 865–83
22. Stefania Bariatti (2010), ‘The Law Applicable to Security Interests in Intellectual Property Rights’, Journal of Private International Law, 6 (2), 395–416
23. Torsten Bettinger and Dorothee Thum (2000), ‘Territorial Trademark Rights in the Global Village – International Jurisdiction, Choice of Law and Substantive Law for Trade Mark Disputes on the Internet’, Parts 1 and 2, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 31 (2 and 3), 162–82, 285–308
24. Axel Metzger (2012), ‘Transnational Law for Transnational Communities: The Emergence of a Lex Mercatoria (or Lex Informatica) for International Creative Communities’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 3 (3), 361–8
25. Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Rochelle C. Dreyfuss and Annette Kur, (2009), ‘The Law Applicable to Secondary Liability in Intellectual Property Cases’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 42, 201–35
26. Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio (2011), ‘Social Networking Sites, An Overview of Applicable Law Issues’, Annali Italiani del Diritto d’Autore, della Cultura e Dello Spettacolo, XX, 3–38
27. Rita Matulionytė (2011), ‘The Law Applicable to Online Copyright Infringements in the ALI and CLIP Proposals: A Rebalance of Interests Needed?’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 2 (1), 26–36
28. Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio (2012), ‘Internet Intermediaries and the Law Applicable to Intellectual Property Infringements’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 3 (3), 350–60
29. Rita Matulionytė (2013), ‘Calling for Party Autonomy in Intellectual Property Infringement Cases’, Journal of Private International Law, 9 (1), April, 77–99
PART IV THE DEMISE OF TERRITORIALITY?
30. Graeme B. Dinwoodie (2009), ‘Developing a Private International Intellectual Property Law: The Demise of Territoriality?’, William and Mary Law Review, 51 (2), November, 711–800
PART V RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGEMENTS
31. Marketa Trimble (2009), ‘Cross-Border Injunctions in U.S. Patent Cases and Their Enforcement Abroad’, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 13, 331–69
32. Marketa Trimble Landova (2009), ‘Public Policy Exception to Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Cases of Copyright Infringement’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 40, 642–65
33. Marketa Trimble (2011), ‘Extraterritorial Intellectual Property Enforcement in the European Union’, Southwestern Journal of International Law, 18, 101–10
Index
Introduction Paul Torremans
PART I TERRITORIALITY
1. Sophie Neumann (2011), ‘Intellectual Property Rights Infringements in European Private International Law: Meeting the Requirements of Territoriality and Private International Law’, Journal of Private International Law, 7 (3), December, 583–600
2. Teruo Doi (2002), ‘The Territoriality Principle of Patent Protection and Conflict of Laws: A Review of Japanese Court Decisions’, Fordham International Law Journal, 26 (2), 377–95
PART II JURISDICTION: MOVING ON FROM THE TERRITORIAL STARTING POINT
3. Lydia Lundstedt (2001), ‘Jurisdiction and the Principle of Territoriality in Intellectual Property Law: Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far in the Other Direction?’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 32 (1), 124–141
4. Benedetta Ubertazzi (2011), ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Exclusive (Subject Matter) Jurisdiction: Between Private and Public International Law’, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 15 (2), Summer, 357–448
5. Mario Franzosi (1997), ‘Worldwide Patent Litigation and the Italian Torpedo’, European Intellectual Property Review, 19 (7), July, 382–5
6. Paul Torremans (2011), ‘The Sense or Nonsense of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Foreign Copyright’, European Intellectual Property Review, 33 (6), 349–56
7. Paul L.C. Torremans (2011), ‘Star Wars Rids Us of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court Does Not Like Kafka Either When It Comes to Copyright’, European Intellectual Property Review, 33 (12), 813–7
8. Annette Kur (2006), ‘A Farewell to Cross-Border Injunctions? The ECJ Decisions GAT v. LuK and Roche Nederland v. Primus and Goldenberg’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 37 (7), 844-55
9. Mario Franzosi (2009), ‘GAT and Roche — Idola Fori, Teatri, Specus: Regulation 864/2007 Makes Cross-Border Patent Litigation Possible’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 4 (4), April, 247–55
10. Benedetta Ubertazzi (2009), ‘Licence Agreements Relating to IP Rights and the EC Regulation on Jurisdiction’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 40 (8), 912–39
11. Matthias Rößler (2007), ‘The Court of Jurisdiction for Joint Parties in International Patent Disputes’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 38 (4), 380–400
12. Christian Heinze (2011), ‘Choice of Court Agreements, Coordination of Proceedings and Provisional Measures in the Reform of the Brussels I Regulation’, Rabels Zeitschrift für Ausländisches und Internationales Privatrecht, 75 (3), July, 581–618
13. Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio (2007), ‘Cross-Border Adjudication of Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Between Jurisdictions’, Annali Italiani del Diritto d’Autore, della Cultura e Dello Spettacolo, XVI, 105–54
PART III CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES
14. Anna Tydniouk (2004), ‘From Itar-Tass to Films by Jove: The Conflict of Laws Revolution in International Copyright’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 29 (2), 897–936
15. Paul Torremans and Carmen Otero García Castrillón (2012), ‘Reversionary Copyright: A Ghost of the Past or a Current Trap to Assignments of Copyright?’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2, 77–93
16. Guido Westkamp (2006), ‘Research Agreements and Joint Ownership of Intellectual Property Rights in Private International Law’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 37 (6), 637–61
17. Paul Torremans (2010), ‘Copyright: Which Law Applies? Some Thoughts on Issues of Authorship, (First) Ownership of Rights and Works Created by Employees’, ΔiMEE Media and Communications Law Review, 1, 6–12
18. Jane C. Ginsburg and Pierre Sirinelli (1991), ‘Authors and Exploitations in International Private Law: The French Supreme Court and the Huston Film Colorization Controversy’, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts, 15, 135–59
19. Paul Torremans (2008), ‘Licenses and Assignments of Intellectual Property Rights Under the Rome I Regulation’, Journal of Private International Law, 4 (3), December, 397–420
20. Christopher Wadlow (2009), ‘The New Private International Law of Unfair Competition and the “Rome II” Regulation’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 4 (11), November, 789–97
21. Toshiyuki Kono (2005), ‘Intellectual Property Rights, Conflict of Laws and International Jurisdiction: Applicability of ALI Principles in Japan?’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 30 (3), 865–83
22. Stefania Bariatti (2010), ‘The Law Applicable to Security Interests in Intellectual Property Rights’, Journal of Private International Law, 6 (2), 395–416
23. Torsten Bettinger and Dorothee Thum (2000), ‘Territorial Trademark Rights in the Global Village – International Jurisdiction, Choice of Law and Substantive Law for Trade Mark Disputes on the Internet’, Parts 1 and 2, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 31 (2 and 3), 162–82, 285–308
24. Axel Metzger (2012), ‘Transnational Law for Transnational Communities: The Emergence of a Lex Mercatoria (or Lex Informatica) for International Creative Communities’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 3 (3), 361–8
25. Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Rochelle C. Dreyfuss and Annette Kur, (2009), ‘The Law Applicable to Secondary Liability in Intellectual Property Cases’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 42, 201–35
26. Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio (2011), ‘Social Networking Sites, An Overview of Applicable Law Issues’, Annali Italiani del Diritto d’Autore, della Cultura e Dello Spettacolo, XX, 3–38
27. Rita Matulionytė (2011), ‘The Law Applicable to Online Copyright Infringements in the ALI and CLIP Proposals: A Rebalance of Interests Needed?’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 2 (1), 26–36
28. Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio (2012), ‘Internet Intermediaries and the Law Applicable to Intellectual Property Infringements’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 3 (3), 350–60
29. Rita Matulionytė (2013), ‘Calling for Party Autonomy in Intellectual Property Infringement Cases’, Journal of Private International Law, 9 (1), April, 77–99
PART IV THE DEMISE OF TERRITORIALITY?
30. Graeme B. Dinwoodie (2009), ‘Developing a Private International Intellectual Property Law: The Demise of Territoriality?’, William and Mary Law Review, 51 (2), November, 711–800
PART V RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGEMENTS
31. Marketa Trimble (2009), ‘Cross-Border Injunctions in U.S. Patent Cases and Their Enforcement Abroad’, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 13, 331–69
32. Marketa Trimble Landova (2009), ‘Public Policy Exception to Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Cases of Copyright Infringement’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 40, 642–65
33. Marketa Trimble (2011), ‘Extraterritorial Intellectual Property Enforcement in the European Union’, Southwestern Journal of International Law, 18, 101–10
Index
